Expelling Slugs, Snails and Earthworms with Allyl-isothiocyanate
C. H. Högger.
Swiss Federal Research Station for Agroecology and Agriculture, Reckenholz,
CH-8046 Zurich chhoegger@gmx.net, M. Barone, Inst. Zoology, Univ. Bern and C. Oberer, Museum of Natural History, Basel
Generally slug populations
are estimated by measuring their activity by means of traps or baits or
combinations of both (Young et al., 1996). Activity of slugs depends
on soil temperature and moisture. Methods using flooding of turves
or soil washing result in approximate numbers per unit of soil volume (South,
1992). Expelling soil macroinvertebrates in a defined area offers a compromise
on efficiency and labor effort.
Literature:
Three expellants were compared:
0.6mM allyl-isothiocyanate (=mustard oil), 0.25% formalin (Chabert et al.
1997) and 0.33 % mustard flour (Högger, 1993). Three hundred
microliters of synthetic allyl-isothiocyanate were dissolved in 8ml 95%
methanol and added to 5 liters of water. Vegetation was cut at soil
level with shears. Steel rings of 15cm height and 56cm diameter(=
1/4m2) were pressed 5cm into the soil and the solution was poured
into the rings. After 15 and 30 minutes a second and third pouring were
carried out. Most slugs and earthworms appeared after the second pouring.
In an experiment in a wild flower strip mustard oil expelled more small
Arion distinctus and A. lusitanicus (<100mg) than formalin.
In BAYER® shelter traps the highest slug numbers were similar to those
found with mustard oil. The numbers and weights of earthworms produced
by the three expellants did not differ significantly from one another,
mustard oil being the most efficient expellant, because the usual digging
after extraction brought fewest additional worms.
In earlier experiments in
summer in a garden with concentrations of 0.2 and 0.4mM mustard oil the
snails Bradybaena fruticum, Cepaea nemoralis, and Oxychilus
draparnaudi were expelled besides the slugs A. distinctus, Boettgerilla
pallens, Deroceras reticulatum and Tandonia budapestensis.
The higher concentration yielded more earthworms than the lower one.
Further field experiments
with a range of concentrations and in different habitats are planned. In
crop fields this absolute method, which measures abundance and is less
weather-dependent than refuge traps, which measure activity (Young et al.,
1996), may be useful to forecast the risk of slug damage several days or
even weeks before sowing.
Chabert, A., Guinot, J.,
Tisseur, M. 1997. Suivi des populations de limaces au champ.
Phytoma
No. 497: 16-20.
Högger, C. H. 1993.
Mustard flour instead of formalin for the extraction of earthworms in the
field.
Bull. Bodenkundl. Ges. Schweiz.17: 5-8.
South, A. 1992. Terrestrial
Slugs. Biology, Ecology and Control. Chapman & Hall, London 428p.
Young, A.G., Port, G.R.,
Craig, A. D., James, D. A. and Green, T. 1996. The use of refuge traps
in assessing
risk of slug damage: a comparison of trap material and bait. BCPC
Symp. Proc.
No. 66:
133-140.
E-Mail: chhoegger@gmx.net